Overall, GitLab may be a better choice for large enterprises that want to centralize development operations using a single platform. GitLab excels in providing an all-in-one development environment that emphasizes seamless team collaboration. It offers a comprehensive suite of tools for project management, issue tracking, code reviews, and workflow automation. As a full DevOps platform, GitLab provides integrated features across the software development lifecycle. Regardless of the all-in-one strategy, GitLab also offers considerable third party integration capabilities so teams can expand its capabilities or integrate GitLab in their existing toolchains. But for veteran developers and teams embedded in DevOps practices, GitLab’s interface is a breeze to use.
Essentially Git isn’t only a version control system but an enabler for collaboration, effective project management and creativity in software development. Its usage as the backbone of platforms like GitHub and GitLab demonstrates it remains fundamental to the collaborative and dynamic nature of contemporary software projects. GitLab Premium includes everything from the free tier but is suited to the enterprise level, including 10,000 compute minutes per month. The additional features include code ownership and protected branches, team planning, enterprise user and incident management, and CI/CD tools.
Setting up continuous integration with GitHub and CircleCI
GitLab Inc. is a privately owned, fully remote company with 1,303 staff members. Only with Git do you have the freedom to work on various https://traderoom.info/gitlab-vs-github/ versions at once. It’s a must-have for any team that wants to do feature-based development. Git has become a foundational tool for developers in startups, enterprises, and even government positions.
Usability and user interface
Users can find plenty of information about how each platform works, as well as tutorials and guides that offer deep dives into specific features or best practices. GitHub and GitLab are both excellent platforms for hosting source code, so choosing between the two can be difficult. Here are factors to weigh to help you pick the one that best suits your organization. There are a range of CI/CD tools available in the marketplace, including those offered by all-in-one VCS platforms like GitLab and GitHub. When it comes to version control platforms, the hosting option you select should align with your project’s size, complexity, infrastructure preferences, and compliance requirements.
Key Takeaways
In addition to common Git capabilities, Gogs supports organization webhooks, including Slack, Discord, and DingTalk. As a part of the Atlassian suite of products, Bitbucket shares many features with both GitLab and GitHub, including a self-hosted option. Thanks to the Atlassian ecosystem, Bitbucket is able to leverage capabilities from Jira, Bamboo, Opsgenie, Statuspage, and more to support the full DevOps life cycle. Value Stream Management (VSM) is an important emerging lean business practice discussed in a previous article. While the GitHub ecosystem does have projects and tools to implement VSM, GitLab has integrated the practice into their platform directly as Value Stream Analytics. Although many adoptions of Git are available today, two hosted solutions have become widely popular with developers and businesses alike – GitHub vs GitLab.
Today GitHub stands as a colossal network, hosting millions of developers and repositories, making it a central hub for collaborative software development. Git is at the center of modern software development toolkit, being the backbone of platforms like GitLab and GitHub. As a distributed version control system, Git offers a convenient way to monitor and trace changes to code, documents or any set of documents over time.
- GitHub also offers some built-in security services, but they are not as extensive, so enterprises would need to rely on third-party tools to secure all stages of the software delivery pipeline on GitHub.
- Both GitLab and GitHub allow you to create repositories for your code, manage permissions, and collaborate with other developers on projects.
- GitLab includes integrated CI/CD pipelines within its platform, offering extensive configuration options and built-in features for a comprehensive DevOps approach.
- So, let’s compare GitLab and GitHub, looking at what they each offer, how they work, their best features, and what they’re best used for.
- It seeks to provide developers, project managers, and organizational decision makers with nuanced understanding of the relative strengths and limits of every platform.
Why a VCS (aka Source Code Management system)?
Consult with a web development company like ValueCoders to make the right decision. Evaluate which platform aligns better with your use cases – GitHub for open-source collaboration versus GitLab for advanced continuous integration and delivery pipelines. GitHub offers a thriving open-source community, ubiquitous popularity, and seamless integration with third-party tools. GitLab, too, unfolds a range of pricing plans, accommodating the needs of various user types. The inclusive nature of GitLab’s pricing structure includes features that might come as add-ons on other platforms. Both GitLab and GitHub allow you to create repositories for your code, manage permissions, and collaborate with other developers on projects.
Since you already have access built into GitLab software, you should save time choosing which CI/CD software to use and configuring it to work with your Git program. It gives managers access to project management and code integrity controls. While both free plans offer unlimited public and private repositories, there’s a notable disparity in the paid plans’ price tags. GitHub is one of the original cloud-based Git platforms that lets developers host and monitor their code changes. With its tidy graphical user interface, GitLab seems somewhat clearer at first, which is why many users of the platform report that it’s easier and more intuitive to use. For example, issues in GitLab are not only displayed as a list, but they can also be organized and managed in a board view.
These features, along with GitHub’s large and active community of open source contributors, provide a rich and versatile development environment. Git, the most popular version control system (VCS) for software teams, enables developers to create multiple branches of a project and work in parallel on different features or bug fixes. When the changes are complete and tested, teams can merge them back into the main codebase. Git is the foundational version control system that underpins the software development process for countless projects worldwide. Regardless of the project’s size or complexity, Git is an indispensable tool.
- Both platforms provide a variety of developer tools, in addition to the project management and security services mentioned above.
- The fact that GitLab offers an extensive set of integrated security tools is also an advantage for enterprises that seek to prioritize software security.
- When Microsoft acquired GitHub in 2018, many expected a mass exodus of its users.
- GitLab offers a complete suite of tools for DevOps and security, including continuous integration/continuous delivery (CI/CD), Agile project management tools, and end-to-end security integrations.
- In addition, Git enables several contributors to be combined in a controlled and efficient way to simplify development.
He not only performs his duties with a strong sense of dedication but also possesses excellent skills in working with diverse teams to make the project a success. This feature lets you discuss and share proposals with team members and outside collaborators. GitLab acts as a cloud storage, making tracking changes easy and creating a collaboration space. As a developer, you can decide to publicly display your repositories or make them private.
GitLab has since grown into an integrated DevOps platform, providing an integrated software development and deployment lifecycle in a single application. This evolution reflects GitLab’s dedication to simplifying the complexity of modern software development processes. Learn more about open-source software development by enrolling in the online course series, Open Source Software Development, Linux and Git Specialization. You’ll learn to manage your public or private software projects efficiently using open-source code repositories while practicing your problem-solving skills with Git and Linux. On the other side of the debate, GitHub offers a wide range of third-party flexibility, a faster deployment, many different options for customizing your experience, and an emphasis on open-source collaboration. If you’re looking for a software development platform to customize to your needs, GitHub’s third-party integrations give you many options.
Both GitLab and GitHub recognize the importance of documentation and communication as foundational capabilities of healthy DevOps organizations. While inline documentation, such as Git Readme files, is included natively only GitLab includes wiki support for free. Even though the platforms share some similarities, they differ in various ways. It is estimated that GitHub has over 100 million users, while GitLab has over 30 million registered users. But GitLab touts deeper DevOps capabilities and a richer feature set for agile product development. Meanwhile, GitLab’s inclusive framework ensures scalability without additional costs, offering a comprehensive toolkit for development endeavors.
GitLab’s broader scope often means it takes slightly longer to master all of its capabilities. GitHub’s focus on developer-centric workflows makes it easier for those new to version control to grasp the fundamentals. Besides the ones we just pointed out, the main difference between GitHub and GitLab rests in the philosophy each platform presents. GitHub is probably the best-known website for hosting software projects, but it’s certainly not the only one. GitLab has become a popular alternative solution for managing Git repositories.
